Planting works in the Northeast region 2026-2027

This tender for planting works demonstrates good data consistency and adherence to green procurement principles, but is severely hampered by the inaccessibility of critical evaluation criteria, significantly impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness for potential bidders.

The tender generally appears compliant with legal requirements, featuring reasonable submission deadlines, an appropriate CPV code, and no reported disputes. The use of ESPD and mention of WTO/GPA indicate adherence to broader procurement frameworks. However, the procedure type 'A' with an N/A code is somewhat vague.

While the general description, AI-extracted requirements, and performance conditions are clear, the critical issue is the inaccessible 'Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad' (Evaluation Criteria) document. This fundamental omission makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged, severely compromising the clarity of the tender process.

The tender provides most basic information, including title, organization, value, and deadlines. However, the inability to access the evaluation criteria document (Document 4) and the lack of AI analysis for the ESPD XML (Document 1) represent significant gaps. The contract duration is specified as a period (2026-2027) but lacks a precise end date, and the NUTS code is missing.

The tender benefits from disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and electronic submission, suggesting a commitment to equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the critical failure to provide access to the evaluation criteria document (Document 4) renders the tender fundamentally unfair, as bidders cannot prepare competitive and compliant proposals without this essential information.

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the lack of a specific contract start date and, more importantly, the inaccessibility of the evaluation criteria document significantly hinder bidders' ability to practically prepare and submit a well-informed bid. While a region map is provided, more granular location details might be beneficial for planning.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and most key fields populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the missing NUTS code and the 'N/A' designation for the procedure type code.

The tender explicitly identifies as 'Green Procurement,' which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks specific mention of social criteria or an innovation focus, and it is not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.