Vinni valla korraldatud jäätmeveo teenuste ostutamine

This tender appears administratively sound with a clear service scope, but the limited access to full document content, particularly technical specifications, hinders a comprehensive quality assessment. A significant drawback is the absence of green, social, and innovation criteria, which are crucial for modern sustainable procurement.

The tender seems legally compliant, explicitly mentioning mandatory exclusion grounds and utilizing the ESPD. The 'Vastavustingimused' document also covers standard legal aspects such as joint tenders and signatory authorization.

The tender title, service description, and basic information are clear. The ESPD document is stated to include 'additional explanations,' suggesting an effort towards clarity. However, without the full technical specification and other key documents, the overall clarity for bidders cannot be fully ascertained.

Basic information and service scope are well-defined. The 'Vastavustingimused' document covers essential procedural requirements. However, the assessment of completeness is severely hampered by the lack of summaries for 4 out of 7 documents, especially the 'Tehniline kirjeldus' (Technical Specification) which is explicitly referenced. Without their content, it's impossible to confirm if all necessary details for a comprehensive bid are provided.

The explicit mention of mandatory exclusion grounds and requirements for joint tenders suggests an intent for a fair process. However, without the technical specifications and evaluation criteria, it's impossible to assess if requirements are overly restrictive or tailored to a specific company. The general nature of the description does not immediately suggest tailoring.

The electronic submission process and clear description of services contribute to practicality. The 36-month contract duration is practical for waste management services.

All provided data points appear consistent.

The automated check explicitly flags 'Not green procurement,' 'No social criteria,' and 'No innovation focus.' This indicates a significant lack of sustainability considerations, which is a major drawback in modern public procurement.