Design and construction works for the expansion of a cowshed complex

This tender for a cowshed complex extension provides a clear project scope and essential documentation, but is significantly undermined by critical data inconsistencies, particularly regarding the CPV code and evaluation criteria, which pose legal and clarity risks.

The tender exhibits significant legal compliance issues, primarily due to the incorrect CPV code (9198 for services instead of construction works) and the direct contradiction in the stated evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price). The procedure type is also vaguely defined.

While the project description and most requirements are clear, the fundamental contradiction regarding the evaluation criteria creates significant ambiguity for bidders. This undermines the overall clarity of the procurement process.

Basic tender information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. Key documents are listed, but the AI's inability to analyze the content of crucial files like the preliminary design (.zip) and price offer form (.xls) limits a full assessment of content completeness.

The tender generally promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and electronic submission. The 'lowest price' evaluation criterion, if consistently applied, is objective. However, the contradiction in evaluation criteria could lead to confusion and potentially impact the transparency and equal treatment of bidders.

The tender scores well on practicality by supporting electronic submission and e-procurement, which streamlines the bidding process. The duration and EU funding information are also clearly stated.

This category presents the most severe issues. There are critical contradictions between the stated estimated value and its classification, the CPV code and its description, and most notably, the evaluation criteria. These inconsistencies are highly problematic.

The tender lacks explicit criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, as confirmed by automated checks. While EU-funded, this does not automatically translate into integrated sustainability requirements within the tender itself.