Estonia14 days leftOpen

MRI-compatible protective cabinet for perfusors and perfusors

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€245,000

DEADLINE

February 16, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Supplies

CPV CODE

33100000-1

REFERENCE

304776

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Hanke esemeks on HAD lisa 1 vastava Magnetresistentse perfuusorite kaitsekappi ja perfuusorite ost koos seadme garantiiaegse hooldus- ja remonditeenusega (24 kuu jooksul) ning garantiijärgse hooldus- ja remonditeenusega (48 kuu jooksul).
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Bidders must not be subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per general procurement regulations and the contracting authority's conditions.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must meet the contracting authority's general conditions and qualification requirements.
  • Bidders must complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
  • Bidders must ensure tender compliance.
  • Bidders must meet requirements for team qualifications.
  • Joint bidders must meet specific conditions for joint bids, including representation rights.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Bidders must meet the technical requirements and specifications for magnet-resistant perfusor cabinets and perfusors.
  • Bidders must meet any specified team qualifications related to technical expertise.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • The bid must include the total cost of the offer.
  • The price proposal must cover magnet-resistant perfusor protective cabinets, perfusors, infusion pumps, charging stations, and related warranty and post-warranty maintenance services.
  • Bids will be evaluated solely on the total cost, with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum number of points.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Tenders must be submitted electronically.
  • The European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) must be completed and submitted.
  • An application form must be submitted to participate.
  • A power of attorney form must be submitted if representing the bidder.
  • For joint bids, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
  • A price proposal form must be submitted, detailing costs for all specified items and services.
  • All tender submission conditions and representation rights must be met.
  • The submission deadline is 2026-02-16 12:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Vastavustingimused
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304776_vastavustingimused.pdf8.5 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the conditions and requirements for tender submission, joint bids, tender compliance, representation rights, and team qualifications that bidders must meet.
DOC
Pakkuja esitab hankemenetluses osalemise avalduse vastavalt lisatud vormile (Vor...
Esitamise VormidVorm_1_Hankemenetluses_osalemise avaldus...37.5 KB
Summary:
This document is an application form that must be submitted to participate in the procurement procedure.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304776_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.8 KB
Summary:
This document specifies that the sole evaluation criterion for bids is the total cost of the offer (100%), with the lowest-priced bid receiving the maximum number of points.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304776_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...63.0 KB
Summary:
This document explains the contracting authority's conditions and qualification requirements for bidders, which must be completed electronically in the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) for tender submission.
DOC
HAD_Lisa-1_Tehniline kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidHAD_Lisa_1_Tehniline_kirjeldus_.doc179.0 KB
Summary:
The document outlines the technical requirements and specifications for magnet-resistant perfusor cabinets and perfusors.
DOC
HAD_Lisa_2_Hankelepingu_vorm
Lepingu MallHAD_Lisa_2_Hankelepingu_vorm.doc63.0 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft contract for the procurement of magnet-resistant perfusor cabinets and perfusors, outlining the terms and legal framework of the future agreement.
DOC
HAD_üldosa
Hanke TingimusedHAD_uldosa.doc53.0 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the general terms, procedures, and administrative requirements for bidders participating in the "Magnetic resonance compatible infusion pumps protective cabinet and infusion pumps" tender.
DOC
Vorm_2_Volikiri
VolikiriVorm_2_Volikiri.doc25.5 KB
Summary:
This document is a power of attorney form, granting authorization to represent the bidder in the procurement procedure.
DOC
Vorm_3_Volitus_ühispakkujad
VolikiriVorm_3_uhispakkujad_volikiri.doc25.5 KB
Summary:
This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, confirming their authorization and right of representation when submitting a tender.
XLS
Vorm_4_ Hinnapakkumuse vorm
Esitamise VormidVorm_4_Hinnapakkumuse_vorm.xlsx11.7 KB
Summary:
This document is a price proposal form for magnet-resistant perfusor protective cabinets and perfusors, infusion pumps, charging stations, and related warranty and post-warranty maintenance services.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear requirements and comprehensive documentation, but a critical inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria could cause confusion. It also lacks explicit sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender provides a reasonable submission deadline and correctly assigned CPV codes. However, the procedure type is vaguely defined as 'Type A' and 'Procedure A' without further specification, even with 'Negotiation Allowed' noted as a characteristic.

Vague definition of procurement procedure type (Type A, Procedure A)
Clarity80/100

The description and most requirements are clear and well-documented. However, there is a significant contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in the characteristics and 'sole evaluation criterion... total cost (100%)' in the evaluation criteria document and AI summary.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% total cost)
Completeness70/100

All basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are provided. Most essential documents are attached. The main gap is the lack of a precise, standard definition for the procurement procedure type.

Procurement procedure type not fully specified
Fairness85/100

Full document access, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and e-procurement support contribute to fairness. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. The inconsistency in evaluation criteria, however, could lead to confusion and perceived unfairness if not clarified.

Inconsistency in evaluation criteria could impact perceived fairness
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, an explicit contract start date is not provided, and direct URLs to all documents outside the e-procurement portal are not listed.

No explicit contract start date
Lack of direct document URLs (assuming access only via portal)
Data Consistency50/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a critical and direct contradiction regarding the evaluation criteria, stating 'relative_weighting' in one section and '100% total cost' in another, which is a fundamental data inconsistency.

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% total cost)
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, representing a missed opportunity for incorporating modern sustainability practices.

No green procurement criteria
No social aspects included

Strengths

Clear description of goods and services
Comprehensive set of tender documents and forms
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Value and duration clearly specified
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% total cost)
Vague definition of procurement procedure type
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria
No explicit contract start date

Recommendations

1. Immediately clarify and rectify the contradiction in the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide a more precise and standard definition of the procurement procedure type.
3. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation criteria in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
71/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes