Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined and appropriate. No disputes or suspensions are noted. However, the missing tender reveal date prevents a full assessment of the reasonableness of the preparation period, and mandatory disclosure of detailed requirements is incomplete in the initial summary.
•Missing tender reveal date
•Mandatory disclosure of detailed requirements incomplete in initial summary
Clarity40/100
While the project description is clear, the AI-extracted requirements explicitly state that specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are not provided in the given tender information. This represents a significant lack of clarity regarding the core requirements for potential bidders.
•No specific eligibility, technical, or financial requirements provided in summary
•No evaluation criteria specified in summary
Completeness50/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of detailed eligibility, technical, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria in the provided summary, requiring bidders to consult external documents for essential information.
•Missing detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements in summary
•Missing evaluation criteria in summary
Fairness55/100
Full document access via the Delta portal and disclosed value contribute positively to fairness. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly impacts transparency and objectivity. The missing tender reveal date also creates uncertainty regarding the reasonableness of the preparation period, potentially affecting equal access.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
•Uncertainty regarding reasonableness of preparation deadlines due to missing reveal date
Practicality85/100
The tender demonstrates good practicality with clear support for electronic submission via the Delta portal, readily available document URLs, a specified contract start date, and a clearly defined duration. Financing information is available as an estimated value.
Data Consistency90/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The estimated value in EUR aligns well with the GBP value mentioned in the PDF summary. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, which is a minor omission.
•Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability50/100
The procurement of electric vehicle charging infrastructure inherently contributes to green initiatives. However, the provided information does not explicitly detail additional green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus within the tender documentation itself, beyond the nature of the service.
•No explicit social criteria mentioned
•No explicit innovation focus mentioned