Publication of current information of SIA “Kurzemes filharmonija” in a local newspaper and its distribution in Ventspils in 2026

This tender for newspaper publication and distribution services demonstrates good clarity and data consistency, supporting e-procurement with a reasonable timeline. However, significant concerns arise from restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value, which severely impact legal compliance, completeness, and fairness for potential bidders.

The tender defines an open procedure, has a reasonable submission deadline, and uses an appropriate CPV code. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value and the flagged 'restricted document access' are significant transparency issues that could impede fair competition and compliance with disclosure requirements.

The service description, duration, and evaluation criteria (lowest price) are clearly stated. Technical and financial requirements are outlined, and a Scope of Work document is provided. However, the AI summary notes that specific mandatory exclusion and eligibility grounds are not detailed in the provided summaries, requiring bidders to consult full documents, which are flagged as having restricted access.

Basic information, deadlines, and location are provided. While documents are listed, the 'restricted document access' flag indicates that full tender documentation is not readily available, which is a major deficiency. The estimated value is also not disclosed, further impacting completeness for bidders.

The tender specifies an open procedure and e-procurement, which generally promotes equal access. However, the 'restricted document access' and the non-disclosure of the estimated value are critical barriers to fairness, preventing potential bidders from fully understanding the tender scope and preparing competitive offers. The requirements, as summarized, do not appear overtly tailored.

The tender supports e-procurement and clearly specifies the service duration (year 2026). The availability of a specific application/financial offer form (Annex 2) is practical. However, the restricted document access and the undisclosed estimated value reduce the practicality for bidders to efficiently prepare and submit a comprehensive bid.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no disputes or suspensions. While some automated check results contradict explicit tender characteristics (e.g., e-submission, evaluation criteria, duration), the core tender information and AI-extracted requirements are largely consistent with each other.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. There is no indication of EU funding that might typically drive higher sustainability standards.