Legal Compliance50/100
The mandatory site visit scheduled for 2026-01-20/21, with today's date being 2026-01-18, provides extremely short notice (1-2 days) for potential bidders. This poses a significant risk to legal compliance, particularly concerning principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination, as it severely limits participation. The missing tender reveal date exacerbates this issue.
•Extremely short notice for mandatory site visit (1-2 days from current date)
•Missing tender reveal date, preventing full assessment of notice period
Clarity65/100
The project description and technical requirements, including the 'Turnkey Service' and RIBA Plan of Work stages, are generally clear. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, leaving bidders uncertain about how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness60/100
Basic information, financial details, and key timelines are provided. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria and the fact that only one of four tender documents was processed/summarized suggest that essential information for a comprehensive bid might be missing from the provided overview.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Only 1 of 4 tender documents processed/summarized
Fairness30/100
The mandatory site visit scheduled with only 1-2 days' notice from the current date creates a severe barrier to entry, significantly undermining equal access and fair competition. This issue, coupled with the absence of transparent evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission, indicates significant fairness concerns.
•Mandatory site visit with extremely short notice (1-2 days from current date)
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency
Practicality50/100
The lack of electronic submission support is a notable practical drawback in modern procurement. Furthermore, the mandatory site visit's short notice period makes participation highly impractical for many potential bidders, especially those requiring travel or significant logistical arrangements.
•No e-submission supported
•Impractical short notice for mandatory site visit
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logically ordered. Minor inconsistencies include the missing 'Liable Person' and 'N/A' codes for procedure types. The timing of the mandatory site visit, while logically ordered, implies a rushed or poorly planned tender release relative to the current date.
•Missing 'Liable Person'
•N/A codes for procedure type
Sustainability40/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation as specific criteria or objectives. While M&E upgrades mention energy efficiency, it is not framed within a broader sustainability strategy for the procurement.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No social criteria