Dynamic Purchasing System Digital Connectivity Services to Understanding Mobile Coverage and Performance

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for digital connectivity services presents significant deficiencies in legal compliance, completeness, and fairness due to missing critical information such as mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria.

The tender critically lacks specified mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed financial requirements, and explicit evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement. The stated contract start date being in the past also raises compliance questions.

While the overall description of the DPS and its categories is clear, the lack of specific evaluation criteria and the general nature of eligibility and technical requirements hinder a bidder's clear understanding of how their submission will be assessed.

The tender is incomplete as it fails to provide essential information such as mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and comprehensive evaluation criteria, which are crucial for a robust procurement process.

The absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness and transparency of the procurement process, as potential suppliers cannot understand the basis of assessment. The contradiction regarding e-submission also raises concerns about equal access.

Practicality is hampered by the contradiction regarding e-submission support and the illogical contract start date being in the past. The lack of a direct document URL in the provided summary could also be a minor practical hurdle.

Significant data inconsistencies are present, notably the contract start date being in the past relative to today's date, and the direct contradiction between 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic and 'No e-submission' as an issue.

The tender includes an 'Innovation Focus,' which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, it explicitly lacks green procurement and social criteria, indicating a limited scope for broader sustainability considerations.