Fuel procurement for the needs of Kalna, Leimaņi, Zasa, and Rubene parishes of Jēkabpils Municipality

This tender for fuel acquisition demonstrates good clarity in its requirements and supports e-procurement, but is significantly hampered by the undisclosed estimated value, an incorrect CPV code, and potential barriers to full document access.

The tender has an incorrect CPV code (0 instead of a valid fuel code) and does not disclose the estimated value, which are significant transparency and compliance issues. While the procedure type is clear and deadlines are reasonable, these omissions detract from overall legal compliance.

The description of the procurement object is clear, and AI-extracted requirements indicate that detailed criteria (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission, and evaluation) are well-documented within the Nolikums and technical specifications. The primary detractor is the incorrect CPV code, which introduces ambiguity in classification.

Basic information, deadlines, and contract duration are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant gap. While documents are listed, the flagged 'Restricted document access' suggests that full, direct access might be limited, impacting overall completeness for potential bidders.

The undisclosed estimated value significantly impacts fairness, as bidders cannot fully assess the opportunity. The flagged 'Restricted document access' also poses a potential barrier, even if documents are available via an e-procurement system. While e-procurement generally promotes equal access and deadlines are reasonable, these issues reduce overall fairness.

Electronic submission is supported, which is a strong practical advantage. However, the absence of a direct document URL (and flagged restricted access), unspecified contract start date, and lack of financing information (estimated value) reduce the tender's overall practicality for bidders.

Several key fields exhibit inconsistencies or are missing. The CPV code is '0' (incorrect), and Type/Procedure codes are 'N/A'. The estimated value is not disclosed despite being marked as 'Not Classified'. Dates are logical, and there are no disputes, but these data gaps and inconsistencies lower the score.

The tender does not include any specific criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.