Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV code are correctly assigned. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and specific financial requirements, coupled with the unusual 'Required: No' for the main document, indicates potential legal compliance gaps for a tender of this value.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing specific financial requirements
Clarity80/100
The service description and technical requirements are very clear and detailed. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly detracts from the overall clarity of how bids will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, value, and duration are present. Nevertheless, the lack of comprehensive tender documents (only one PDF, marked 'not required'), missing mandatory exclusion grounds, missing financial requirements, and missing evaluation criteria represent significant gaps in completeness.
•Lack of comprehensive tender documents
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness85/100
The technical requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission significantly impact the transparency and equal access for bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No electronic submission option
Practicality65/100
The absence of electronic submission is a notable practical drawback in modern procurement. While contract start date and duration are clear, the lack of e-submission makes the process less streamlined.
•No electronic submission option
Data Consistency90/100
Data is generally consistent, but there is a notable inconsistency between the stated 'Contract Duration: 36 months' and the document summary mentioning a 'potential 5-year contract'. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.
•Inconsistency in contract duration (36 months vs. 5 years)
•Missing 'Liable Person' information
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not include any explicit green, social, or innovation criteria. As a standard security service, it lacks any specific focus on sustainability aspects.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria