Dynamic Purchasing System for Design, Print and Related Services

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) demonstrates good procedural structure and e-procurement capabilities, but suffers from significant deficiencies in the clarity and completeness of key requirements and evaluation criteria within the provided summary information.

The tender correctly identifies as an Open procedure DPS with appropriate CPV and NUTS codes, and no disputes are reported. However, the provided summary explicitly lacks details on mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements, which are fundamental disclosures. The classified value also presents a minor transparency concern.

While the overall description of the DPS purpose is clear, the AI-extracted requirements explicitly state that details regarding mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical capability, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are 'not available'. This severely impacts the clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and duration is present. However, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the explicit absence of all critical requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) and evaluation criteria in the provided summary. The estimated value is also not disclosed.

The use of E-Procurement and the continuous application nature of a DPS contribute positively to fairness. However, the classified estimated value and, critically, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly undermine transparency and equal opportunity for bidders. It is impossible to assess if requirements are tailored without their details.

The tender supports E-Procurement, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While document access is implied, an explicit URL is not provided in the summary, and the classified value limits financial planning for potential bidders.

The dates for the DPS (start 2022, duration 48 months, submission deadline 2026) are logical and consistent for this type of procurement. No disputes or suspensions are reported. The 'Liable Person' field is empty, which is a minor data gap.

The provided information does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate modern sustainability and social responsibility considerations into the procurement process.