Latvia, Latvia
€41,999
February 02, 2026 at 10:00
Other
160704
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender is well-structured and detailed, but its transparency and fairness are significantly undermined by contradictions regarding e-procurement and potential restricted document access.
The tender defines a clear open procedure, assigns appropriate CPV codes, and specifies reasonable deadlines. It is EU-funded and includes stringent security checks (SAB, VDD) which, while demanding, are likely justified for a system supporting children's development and risk analysis. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag is a concern for legal transparency.
The tender's description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive, well-categorized, and reference specific forms. Evaluation criteria based on the lowest price are specified in the document summary, providing clear guidance for bidders.
All essential information, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, duration, and classification, is provided. A comprehensive set of 16 documents is summarized, indicating thorough documentation. The 'Restricted document access' flag, if it implies actual inaccessibility for bidders, would impact completeness from their perspective.
The tender discloses its value and specifies objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' issue are significant concerns, creating barriers to equal access and transparency. The stringent security checks, while specific, appear justified by the nature of the service rather than being tailored to a specific company.
The duration and financing information are clearly specified. However, the reported lack of e-submission functionality is a major practical drawback, hindering efficient participation. The contract start date is not explicitly provided.
Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes. However, a significant contradiction exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' issue. There is also a minor inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria, though clarified by document content.
The tender is EU-funded, which often implies adherence to higher standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the tender requirements themselves.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes