Legal Compliance40/100
The tender lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for legal compliance. The absence of a liable person and a clear reveal date further diminishes its legal robustness.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing eligibility requirements
Clarity50/100
While the service description and technical capability requirements are clear, the overall clarity for bidders is severely impacted by the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
Completeness45/100
The tender is significantly incomplete, lacking crucial information such as evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and the liable person. A discrepancy in the estimated value also exists.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness35/100
The complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged. The lack of e-submission also creates potential barriers to equal access.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality55/100
The tender's practicality is reduced by the absence of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. Other practical details like contract duration and start date are well-defined.
Data Consistency60/100
There is a notable inconsistency in the estimated value (EUR vs GBP in document summary). Key fields like 'Liable Person' and explicit requirements are also unpopulated, affecting overall data consistency.
•Estimated value discrepancy (£ vs €)
•Missing liable person
Sustainability50/100
The tender includes an 'Innovation Focus' which is positive. However, it explicitly lacks green procurement and social criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria