Provision of GP Based Sexual Health Services 23-26

This tender for a Pseudo Dynamic Purchasing System (Ps DPS) has a clear service description and supports e-procurement, but suffers from significant transparency issues due to undisclosed value, missing evaluation criteria, and absent mandatory exclusion grounds.

The absence of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria, alongside the classified estimated value, represents significant legal compliance shortcomings regarding transparency and fair competition principles. The procedure type and CPV are correctly identified, and the application window is reasonable.

While the service description and eligibility requirements are clear, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion/financial grounds creates substantial ambiguity for potential applicants. Technical requirements refer to an external specification, which is standard.

Basic tender information, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete in critical areas due to the undisclosed estimated value, missing evaluation criteria, and the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion and financial requirements.

The classified estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely undermine the fairness and transparency of this procurement process. While requirements appear generic and e-procurement is enabled, these omissions create an uneven playing field.

The tender supports e-procurement, and the contract duration and the start date of the Ps DPS are specified, which aids practicality. The lack of detailed financing information beyond the classified value is a minor drawback.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no disputes or suspensions. The 'Contract Start' date, while initially appearing inconsistent with the submission deadline, is logical within the context of a Pseudo Dynamic Purchasing System's validity period.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green, social, or innovation-focused procurement criteria, nor is it EU-funded, indicating a lack of emphasis on broader sustainability objectives.