Restoration of the state-significant watercourse Starica, land improvement cadastral code 42672:01, pk.00/00-86/60 in Nautrēni parish, Rēzekne municipality

This tender for watercourse restoration is generally well-structured with clear basic information, financial details, and objective evaluation criteria. However, potential issues with document accessibility and the lack of explicit sustainability criteria present areas for improvement.

The tender defines an open procedure, uses appropriate CPV codes, and specifies EU funding, indicating adherence to relevant regulations. The 31-day submission period is reasonable. However, the "Restricted document access" flag, if accurate, poses a potential compliance risk regarding transparency.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, referencing a main technical specification document for details. Evaluation criteria (price and duration) are explicitly stated, contradicting an automated flag.

All essential basic information, financial details, and timelines are provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined. The main specification document is summarized. However, the "Restricted document access" flag and the lack of content for '1.pielikums' suggest potential gaps in full documentation availability.

The tender promotes fairness through an open procedure, disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, objective evaluation criteria (price and duration), and confirmed e-procurement. Requirements appear generic. The "Restricted document access" flag is the primary concern for equal access.

Electronic submission is supported, and EU funding is specified. However, the tender does not provide a clear contract start date, and the duration is a bidder proposal rather than a fixed term from the contracting authority, which could affect planning.

Key fields are populated, and dates are logical. While automated checks flagged some inconsistencies (e.g., evaluation criteria, e-submission, duration), these appear to be misinterpretations, as the tender's characteristics and AI-extracted requirements provide consistent information.

The tender is EU-funded, which often implies adherence to certain environmental and social standards. However, the provided information does not explicitly detail green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within its specific requirements.