Facilities Management and Workplace Services DPS

This tender for a Facilities Management DPS is well-described and offers a compliant route to market with a reasonable application period. However, it suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements, significantly impacting clarity and fairness for potential applicants.

The procedure type (DPS) and CPV code are correctly defined. No disputes are noted. However, the absence of a reveal date makes it impossible to assess the initial notice period, and the summary lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which are standard legal requirements.

The description of the DPS and the services offered is very clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of explicit financial requirements or mandatory exclusion grounds significantly reduce the overall clarity for applicants regarding the assessment process.

Basic information, estimated value, duration, and CPV code are all provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the missing reveal date, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, and the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided summary.

The disclosed value, the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, and the very long submission deadline contribute positively to fairness. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major concern, as it prevents transparency and objective assessment, making it difficult for all bidders to compete equally.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. The absence of a direct document URL in the provided information is a minor practical inconvenience. The lack of specific financial requirements might simplify initial application for some, but could also lead to less pre-qualified suppliers.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the empty 'Liable Person' field and 'Code: N/A' for procedure types. The automated check's contradiction regarding e-submission is noted but overridden by the tender's explicit characteristic.

The tender shows minimal explicit focus on sustainability. While 'Smart FM Solutions' hints at innovation, there are no clear green procurement criteria, social aspects, or broader innovation objectives outlined. It is not EU funded.