Legal Compliance75/100
The absence of a tender reveal date makes it impossible to verify compliance with minimum publication period requirements. Furthermore, the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance issue, hindering transparency and fair competition.
•Missing tender reveal date
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100
The project description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and detailed, outlining the scope and desired functionalities. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely diminishes the clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, financial details, and timeline are well-provided. Technical requirements are detailed. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria and ambiguity regarding the full Invitation to Tender (ITT) document's accessibility are notable gaps.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Ambiguity regarding the availability of the full Invitation to Tender (ITT) document
Fairness60/100
The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it prevents objective and transparent assessment of bids. The absence of e-submission also creates an unnecessary barrier to equal access. While requirements are detailed, they do not appear overtly tailored to a specific company.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. A direct URL for accessing tender documents is also not explicitly provided, potentially complicating access for interested parties.
•No e-submission
•No direct document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100
The data provided is largely consistent and logical, with key dates and financial information aligning. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for the procedure type, but these do not significantly impact overall data integrity.
•'Liable Person' field is empty
•'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are N/A
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly highlights an 'Innovation Focus,' which is a positive aspect. However, it completely lacks any explicit criteria or considerations for green procurement or social aspects, indicating a missed opportunity for broader sustainability integration.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria