United Kingdom118 days leftOpen

Star Academies Furniture and Associated Services

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

STAR ACADEMIES

LOCATION

North West England, United Kingdom

VALUE

£1,638,000

DEADLINE

May 31, 2026 at 23:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

39000000

REFERENCE

001471-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

Star Academies (Star) is a not-for-profit multi-academy trust. As one of the UK’s leading trusts, Star runs a diverse network of primary and secondary schools across the UK. Star currently comprises 36 schools - 11 primary schools, 23 secondary schools and two ‘all through’ schools. There is also a Head Office and Professional Development institute, both based in Blackburn. Our schools are located in five regional clusters: Lancashire, Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, West Midlands and Greater London. The trust is expected to grow over the lifetime of the contract. Further details about the Trust can be found on our website: www.staracademies.org. Star Academies are looking to run an FTS (above threshold) competitive flexible procedure compliant under PA2023 to appoint a single suitable supplier for each lot (region), suppliers may bid and be appointed for more than one lot (region). The suppliers selected will be able to provide a supply, installation, and packaging removal service for furniture across all Star Academies estate, this may also include a small-scale design element. Whilst the tender will be used as a basis for future works and pricing, the trust are looking to engage suppliers who will work collaboratively with us and tailor their approach, so that they are able to meet the specific needs of the trust. This procurement also seeks to ensure that value for money is achieved for the trust and that the trust’s furniture and quality requirements are well managed and run in an efficient and consistent way across our entire estate. The contract will run for an initial period of three years (plus a possible two further 12-month extensions) and successful bidders will remain on the contract for this period subject to performance and company stability (i.e. the company not going into administration). The tender is split into four lots to cover the respective regions where the schools are located, these are: • Lot 1 - North West • Lot 2 - West Yorkshire • Lot 3 - West Midlands • Lot 4 - London Star are looking to shortlist up to three (3) companies per lot, identified from this Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ), to receive the ITT pack which will provide a more detailed set of requirements. However, for the purposes of this shortlisting stage, bidders should assume that the ITT will include, but not be limited to: • Supply and delivery of loose furniture items including but not limited to classroom chairs and desks, teacher chairs and desks, pedestals, office/admin chairs and desks, storage units for classrooms and office spaces. This may also include a small scale design element. • Installation and packaging removal for goods. The trust has provided a trust standard contract as part of the PSQ pack. Star’s preference is to engage with suppliers directly who will manage all aspects of the contract in house. If sub-contracts are required to meet the scope of this tender, these should be minimised. Any subcontracted arrangements must meet the same terms as the contract and will be the responsibility of the main supplier to manage.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Bidder must not be subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per the Public Contracts Regulations 2023 (PA2023).
  • Bidder must demonstrate company stability and not be in administration, as this is a condition for remaining on contract.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a single suitable supplier capable of providing services for one or more specified lots (regions).
  • Be able to operate within the specified UK regions: North West, West Yorkshire, West Midlands, and London.
  • Be a legally constituted entity capable of entering into a contract for an initial period of three years, with possible extensions of two further 12-month periods.
  • Accept the trust's standard contract terms, provided as part of the PSQ pack.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Ability to supply and deliver a comprehensive range of loose furniture items, including but not limited to classroom chairs and desks, teacher chairs and desks, pedestals, office/admin chairs and desks, and storage units for classrooms and office spaces.
  • Capability to provide full installation services for supplied goods.
  • Capability to provide packaging removal services for supplied goods.
  • Ability to offer a small-scale design element for furniture solutions.
  • Demonstrated capacity to work collaboratively with Star Academies and tailor approaches to meet specific trust needs.
  • Proven ability to ensure value for money, high-quality furniture, efficient management, and consistent service delivery across the entire estate.
  • Preference for managing all aspects of the contract in-house; if subcontracting is required, it must be minimised, meet the same contract terms, and be the responsibility of the main supplier to manage.
  • Ability to scale services to accommodate the trust's expected growth over the contract lifetime.
  • Capacity to serve one or more of the four specified lots (regions): Lot 1 - North West, Lot 2 - West Yorkshire, Lot 3 - West Midlands, Lot 4 - London.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Demonstrate company stability to ensure continued performance throughout the contract duration, specifically not going into administration. (No explicit financial thresholds are stated for the PSQ stage, but stability is a key factor).
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a completed Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ) for shortlisting.
  • Clearly indicate the specific lot(s) (region(s)) for which the company is bidding: Lot 1 - North West, Lot 2 - West Yorkshire, Lot 3 - West Midlands, Lot 4 - London.
  • Ensure the submission is made by the specified deadline: 2026-05-31 23:00:00.
  • Acknowledge that the ITT pack, if shortlisted, will contain more detailed requirements, but the PSQ submission should address the assumed scope of supply, installation, packaging removal, and potential small-scale design.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF001471-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This tender notice invites suppliers to bid for furniture supply, installation, and packaging removal services for Star Academies' schools across four UK regions (North West, West Yorkshire, West Midlands, London), aiming to shortlist up to three companies per lot for further ITT procedures.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

65
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a well-structured approach for furniture procurement, clearly defining the scope and multi-stage process, but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria for the shortlisting stage and practical access to full documentation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender explicitly states compliance with PA2023 and uses an appropriate CPV code. The submission period is reasonable. However, the missing reveal date and, more critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria for the PSQ stage are significant transparency and fairness issues under procurement regulations.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified for PSQ stage
Clarity75/100

The description of the trust, scope of work, contract duration, and lot structure is clear. The AI-extracted requirements are well-categorized and understandable. The primary deficiency is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria for the initial PSQ shortlisting stage, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria for PSQ stage
Completeness65/100

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and location are largely complete. Requirements are detailed. However, the tender lacks explicit evaluation criteria for the PSQ stage and a direct URL for accessing the full tender documents (PSQ pack). The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

Missing evaluation criteria for PSQ stage
No direct document URL
Fairness60/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the PSQ submission period is generous. However, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria for the shortlisting stage significantly compromises fairness. The lack of e-submission and the 'Required: No' status for the main PDF also present potential barriers to equal access and transparency.

Missing evaluation criteria for PSQ stage
No e-submission
Practicality55/100

The contract duration and start date are specified, though the identical submission and start dates are logically inconsistent. The lack of electronic submission and a direct URL for tender documents creates practical hurdles for bidders.

No e-submission
No document URL
Data Consistency60/100

Most key fields are populated, and there are no disputes. However, the identical submission deadline and contract start date is a significant logical inconsistency. Minor inconsistencies include N/A codes for procedure type and an empty 'Liable Person' field.

Identical submission deadline and contract start date
N/A codes for procedure type
Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly includes an "Innovation Focus" and mentions a "small-scale design element," which are positive aspects. However, it lacks specific criteria or considerations for green procurement or social aspects, which are increasingly important in modern public tenders.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of scope, lots, and multi-stage process
Explicit compliance with UK PA2023 regulations
Detailed and well-categorized AI-extracted requirements
Value disclosed and reasonable PSQ submission period
Includes an "Innovation Focus" characteristic

Concerns

Absence of explicit evaluation criteria for the PSQ shortlisting stage
Missing reveal date for the tender
Lack of electronic submission capability
No direct URL for accessing full tender documents
Inconsistent contract start date (same as submission deadline)

Recommendations

1. Publish clear and objective evaluation criteria for the PSQ shortlisting stage to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Provide a direct URL for all tender documents and enable electronic submission.
3. Clarify the contract start date to ensure logical consistency with the procurement timeline.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
65/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes