Development of assessments, a manual for legal matters, and a quality standard

This tender presents a structured approach with detailed documentation and EU funding, but its quality is significantly undermined by a lack of transparency regarding the estimated value and critical 'restricted document access'.

The tender adheres to reasonable deadlines and clearly defines the procedure type and CPV code. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the flagged 'restricted document access' are significant concerns regarding legal transparency and compliance with disclosure requirements.

The description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive. While 'No evaluation criteria specified' was flagged, the document summaries and AI-extracted requirements indicate that evaluation criteria are defined within the detailed technical specifications, suggesting good clarity in the documentation itself.

Basic information, requirements, and criteria are well-defined across the 8 provided documents. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, which are notable gaps in completeness.

The 'Restricted document access' is a major impediment to fairness, as it prevents equal access to information. The undisclosed estimated value also hinders fair competition. While e-procurement is enabled and deadlines are reasonable, these critical transparency issues significantly reduce the fairness score.

Electronic submission is supported, and financing information (EU funded) is available. However, the absence of a clear contract start date and duration reduces the practicality for potential bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include 'N/A' codes for type/procedure and a potentially misleading CPV format. There's also a contradiction between automated checks flagging 'No e-submission' and the tender explicitly stating 'E-Procurement'.

The tender is EU funded, which often implies higher standards. However, it explicitly lacks specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability principles.