Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV code are correct, and no disputes are noted. However, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the missing reveal date are significant compliance issues for transparency in an open procedure.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100
The service description, objective, and technical requirements for operators are clear. The division into lots is also well-defined. The primary drawback is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is crucial for tenderers.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, value, duration, and some key requirements are present. However, the AI-extracted requirements explicitly note the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria from the provided text, indicating significant gaps.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds in summary
•Missing financial requirements in summary
Fairness85/100
Full document access via e-tendering, disclosed value, and non-tailored technical requirements contribute to fairness. The division into 8 lots also promotes wider participation. The major concern is the absence of evaluation criteria, which hinders objective bid preparation.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission is supported, and the document URL, contract start date, and duration are clearly provided. The clause stating 'contract requirements will be subject to available financial resources' introduces a degree of practical uncertainty.
•Contract requirements subject to available financial resources
Data Consistency90/100
The data is largely consistent and logical, with dates aligning and key financial/timeline information populated. Minor inconsistencies include an unpopulated 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure type.
•Liable Person field is empty
•Procedure type codes are N/A
Sustainability50/100
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. This represents a missed opportunity for modern public procurement practices.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria