Requalification of equipment for the Centralized Sterilization and Sterile Material Supply Department

This tender for equipment requalification demonstrates good clarity and a well-structured process, including e-procurement and division into parts. However, the undisclosed estimated value and potential document access issues significantly impact fairness and completeness.

The tender adheres to standard legal frameworks with a reasonable submission period (17 days) and a clearly defined open procedure. The CPV code is appropriate, and no disputes are noted. However, the lack of a disclosed estimated value is a minor compliance concern regarding full transparency.

The tender description is clear, and requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial aspects are well-referenced to specific documents. Evaluation criteria, based on the lowest price for each part, are explicitly stated, which contradicts the automated flag of 'Missing evaluation criteria'.

Basic information, deadlines, and contract duration are provided. All required documents are summarized, indicating their content is defined. The significant omission is the undisclosed estimated value, which hinders a comprehensive understanding of the procurement's scale.

The tender benefits from an open procedure, e-procurement, and division into parts, promoting competition. However, the undisclosed estimated value is a major impediment to fair competition, as bidders cannot adequately assess market conditions. The 'Restricted document access' flag, if it implies difficulty in obtaining full documents, also reduces fairness.

Electronic submission is supported, which is a key practical advantage. The duration is clear. However, the absence of a contract start date, undisclosed financing information (value), and potential issues with direct document URLs (as per 'Restricted document access' flag) reduce the overall practicality for bidders.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and no disputes are reported. Most essential fields are populated, though the N/A codes for type/procedure and the undisclosed value represent minor data gaps.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation criteria. This is a common characteristic for technical service tenders but results in a low score for this specific category.