Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and the submission period of 22 days is reasonable. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance issue, as it undermines transparency and equal treatment principles required by procurement regulations.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100
The description of the framework, its tiers, and the scope of services is clear and unambiguous. Requirements are well-documented and understandable. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity regarding how bids will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
All basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration, is provided. Documents are available. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of defined evaluation criteria, which are essential for bidders to prepare comprehensive proposals.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness65/100
The tender value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot understand the basis of award. The absence of e-procurement also limits equal access for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and financing information is available with appropriate caveats. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure type, but these do not significantly impact overall data integrity.
•'Liable Person' field is empty
•N/A codes for procedure type
Sustainability50/100
The tender explicitly includes 'Social Criteria' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect of sustainability. However, it lacks any stated focus on green procurement or innovation, and it is not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
•Not green procurement
•No innovation focus