Yorkshire Highway Alliance Supply of Winter Road Surface Treatments and Sundries

This tender for winter road surface treatments demonstrates good basic information and data consistency but suffers from significant gaps in clarity, completeness, and fairness due to missing evaluation criteria and detailed requirements.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the missing reveal date and the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds are notable disclosure gaps, impacting the ability to fully assess compliance with reasonable timeframes and standard legal requirements.

While the overall description is clear, the critical absence of evaluation criteria is a major flaw. Additionally, the AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are high-level and lack specific details, making it difficult for bidders to understand precise expectations.

Basic information, value, and duration are present. However, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and detailed eligibility/exclusion grounds. This lack of crucial information hinders bidders from submitting comprehensive proposals.

The absence of evaluation criteria is a critical fairness issue, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged. Furthermore, the lack of e-submission functionality reduces equal access and convenience for potential suppliers. The 19-day submission period for a multi-lot framework of this value is also quite tight, potentially limiting preparation time.

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The absence of a direct document URL also adds a minor inconvenience for accessing tender materials.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for the procedure type. The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value is a slight ambiguity but does not hinder understanding.

The tender does not incorporate any green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.