Acquisition of various household goods and building materials for the needs of Līvāni Municipality institutions (in Līvāni)

This tender for household goods and construction materials exhibits mixed quality, with basic information present but critical documents flagged as restricted and evaluation criteria missing. These deficiencies significantly undermine the clarity, completeness, and fairness of the procurement process.

While the procedure type is defined and the submission deadline is reasonable, the flagged 'Restricted document access' and 'No evaluation criteria specified' pose significant risks to legal compliance and mandatory disclosure requirements.

The tender description is clear, but the explicit flag of 'No evaluation criteria specified' (despite a document claiming to contain them) creates significant ambiguity for bidders regarding how their offers will be assessed. Restricted document access further hinders clarity.

Basic information, deadlines, and value are provided. However, the 'Restricted document access' and 'No evaluation criteria specified' flags indicate that crucial information required for a complete bid is either inaccessible or absent, making the tender incomplete from a bidder's perspective.

The 'Restricted document access' and 'No evaluation criteria specified' are critical fairness issues. Bidders cannot prepare competitive offers or trust the evaluation process if key information is inaccessible or undefined. There is no explicit evidence of tailoring, but the lack of transparency is a major concern.

E-Procurement is indicated, which is a positive for practicality. However, the lack of a direct document URL (or the 'Restricted document access' implying it's not easily available) and the absence of a contract start date reduce overall practicality for potential bidders.

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are significant contradictions. The most critical is the conflicting information regarding 'evaluation criteria' (claimed in Document 3 summary vs. flagged as missing). There's also a contradiction regarding 'E-Procurement' vs. 'No e-submission'.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.