“Supply of medical equipment to SIA “Kuldīgas slimnīca””

This tender suffers from critical transparency and completeness issues due to the complete lack of accessible documentation, making it impossible for potential bidders to understand the requirements or prepare a submission. The fundamental principles of fair and open competition are severely undermined.

The complete absence of accessible tender documents, including technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and the draft contract, severely undermines the principles of transparency and equal treatment, which are fundamental to public procurement law. Bidders cannot assess the tender without these essential documents.

While a brief description is provided, the actual requirements, technical specifications, and contractual terms are inaccessible. This renders the tender completely unclear for any potential bidder, making it impossible to understand the scope or expectations.

The tender is critically incomplete. Essential information such as the estimated value, detailed technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and the draft contract are entirely missing or inaccessible. The CPV code '1' is also highly unspecific and likely an error, further indicating incompleteness.

The restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria create a highly unfair environment. Only bidders with prior, potentially privileged, knowledge of the requirements could realistically prepare a bid, raising significant concerns about equal opportunity and potential tailoring for a specific company.

It is entirely impractical for any potential bidder to prepare a submission. Without access to the technical specifications, financial proposal template, and draft contract, bidders cannot understand what is required or how to formulate a compliant offer.

The CPV code '1' is a significant inconsistency and likely an error, as CPV codes are typically specific 8-digit numbers. This indicates a data entry issue and a lack of proper classification.

The automated check indicates that green procurement aspects are not considered, which is a missed opportunity for incorporating sustainability criteria into the procurement of medical equipment.