Atkārtots iepirkums operāciju galda iegādei

This tender for an operating table shows moderate quality, with basic information provided but significant concerns regarding document access and data consistency, which severely impact fairness and clarity.

The tender defines an open procedure and provides reasonable deadlines. However, restricted document access and minor inconsistencies in CPV and procedure type codes raise compliance concerns regarding transparency and full disclosure.

While the tender description is clear and Document 3 indicates detailed requirements, the 'Restricted document access' and 'No content extracted' for the main tender document (Nolikumus) severely hinder overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information like title, organization, value, and deadlines are complete. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the lack of content for the main tender document (Nolikumus) indicate critical information may be missing or inaccessible to bidders.

The 'Restricted document access' is a critical flaw, preventing equal and transparent access to essential information for all potential bidders. The contradiction regarding e-submission also raises fairness concerns if electronic submission is not truly available.

The contract duration is specified. However, the significant contradiction regarding e-submission (E-Procurement characteristic vs. No e-submission automated check) creates uncertainty and impacts the practicality of bid submission. A specific contract start date is also not provided.

Several inconsistencies are present, including the CPV code (0 vs 33000000), the conflicting information on e-submission, and the N/A codes for tender type and procedure. Dates are logical and consistent.

The tender does not include any specific criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.