Skip to main content
Tenders

T1-5936-Sage-DPS-Defects

Open
Deadline
150 days left
August 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
020886-2021
Value
Not disclosed
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

August 24, 2021

Deadline for Questions

August 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

August 24, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
60 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Restricted Procedure
63
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Sage has established a DPS to deliver defect rectification repairs, where these cannot or have not been completed by the developer. Sage will be the only purchasing organisation to utilise the DPS.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

8 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit the application to participate in the DPS by the deadline: 2026-08-24 11:00:00.
--No specific submission forms or required document formats are detailed in the provided tender information.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Be an interested supplier for defect rectification repairs.
--Be capable of delivering defect rectification repairs.
--Participate in the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) established by Sage Housing Association.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements (e.g., experience, qualifications, personnel, equipment) are detailed in the provided tender information.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, specific insurance levels) are detailed in the provided tender information.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

1 documents available with AI summaries

Official PDF VersionPDF
020886-2021_official.pdf

Sage Housing Association has established a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for defect rectification repairs, inviting interested suppliers to participate in this system which will be exclusively used by Sage.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is critically incomplete, lacking essential documentation and specific requirements, which severely compromises transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed selection criteria (technical, financial) raises significant legal compliance concerns regarding transparency, equal treatment, and proportionality, which are fundamental principles of public procurement.

Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds
Lack of detailed selection criteria (technical, financial)
Clarity40/100

The tender information is extremely vague. Key requirements are missing, making it unclear what suppliers need to demonstrate or how they will be evaluated, leading to significant ambiguity for potential participants.

Vague eligibility criteria
No specific technical capability requirements
Completeness75/100

The tender is highly incomplete. Critical information such as comprehensive tender documents, detailed selection and award criteria, evaluation methodology, and full contract terms are entirely absent, making it impossible for suppliers to prepare a proper bid.

No tender documents attached or available
No detailed technical capability requirements
Fairness40/100

The profound lack of specific requirements and evaluation criteria creates a significant risk of unfair treatment, arbitrary decision-making, and potential for favoritism, severely hindering fair competition among interested suppliers.

Absence of clear selection criteria
Potential for arbitrary evaluation
Practicality40/100

From a supplier's perspective, it is impractical to prepare a meaningful application without any specific requirements, documents, or clear evaluation guidelines. For the contracting authority, evaluating applications without defined criteria will be challenging and prone to inconsistencies.

Difficult for suppliers to prepare a meaningful application
Challenging for the authority to evaluate consistently
Data Consistency100/100

The provided data is minimal, making comprehensive consistency checks difficult. However, the consistent lack of detail across all requirement sections (eligibility, technical, financial, submission) is a major concern.

Overall lack of detail prevents comprehensive consistency checks
Sustainability0/100

There is no mention of green procurement or social criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives into the procurement process.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Basic tender information (title, reference, organization, description, CPV code) is provided.
Clear indication of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for defect rectification repairs.
Long contract duration (60 months) offers potential stability for successful suppliers.

Concerns

Complete absence of any tender documents, which is fundamental for any procurement.
Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed selection criteria (technical, financial).
No disclosed estimated value, hindering informed supplier decision-making.
Vague eligibility and submission requirements, leading to ambiguity.
High risk of arbitrary evaluation and lack of transparency in the selection process.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish comprehensive tender documents detailing all requirements, selection criteria, evaluation methodology, and the full rules of the DPS.
2. Clearly define mandatory exclusion grounds and specific, measurable technical and financial capability requirements.
3. Disclose the estimated value of the DPS to aid supplier interest and planning, and specify required submission formats and methods.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Add to Pipeline