Health insurance services for employees of Ogre Municipality and its institutions

This tender is severely lacking in essential documentation and detailed specifications, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer. The absence of core tender documents and critical information raises significant concerns regarding transparency, fairness, and legal compliance.

Legal compliance is highly questionable due to the absence of explicitly mentioned mandatory exclusion grounds, which are typically a legal requirement in public procurements. The lack of full tender documents also prevents a thorough assessment of compliance with procurement regulations.

The tender suffers from significant clarity issues. The CPV code is overly broad and incorrect for health insurance services, making it difficult for relevant suppliers to find. Key requirements are vaguely phrased, such as 'Submit selection requirements,' which places the burden of defining eligibility criteria on bidders rather than the contracting authority. Technical requirements are presented as bidder submissions rather than clear specifications from the procuring entity.

The tender is critically incomplete. Essential information such as the estimated value, full tender documents, evaluation criteria, and contract duration are entirely missing. The technical requirements are listed as items for bidders to provide, rather than detailed specifications from the contracting authority, indicating a severe lack of completeness in the tender's scope definition.

Fairness is severely compromised by the restricted document access and the absence of evaluation criteria. Without clear and accessible tender documents and transparent evaluation methods, bidders cannot compete on an equal footing, and the process lacks transparency. The vague requirements could also lead to subjective evaluations.

From a bidder's perspective, this tender is highly impractical. Without access to full tender documents, detailed specifications, an estimated value, or clear evaluation criteria, it is virtually impossible to formulate a competitive and compliant proposal.

Data consistency is poor, primarily due to the incorrect and overly broad CPV code (4) which does not align with 'health insurance services.' Other information is too sparse to assess consistency comprehensively.

No information regarding sustainability requirements or considerations is provided in the tender summary, making it impossible to assess this aspect.