Grounds and amenities maintenance contract

This tender for grounds maintenance services exhibits significant deficiencies in legal compliance, completeness, and fairness due to the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed eligibility, and evaluation criteria. While basic information is present and consistent, the overall quality of the procurement process is compromised.

The tender critically lacks specified mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed eligibility requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement. While the procedure type and CPV codes are appropriate, these omissions represent a severe non-compliance issue.

The service description and technical requirements are clear and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to understand how proposals will be judged.

While basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration are present, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed eligibility requirements, and, most importantly, evaluation criteria. The 'Required: No' status for the official PDF is also confusing.

The absence of clear and objective evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot transparently understand the basis for award. The lack of e-submission also limits equal access, and the general absence of detailed eligibility criteria could inadvertently favor specific bidders.

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. While contract start date and duration are clear, the absence of e-submission creates an unnecessary barrier for bidders.

The provided data points, such as estimated value (EUR and GBP), contract duration, and key dates, are internally consistent and logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable data set for the information provided.

The tender makes no mention of any green procurement aspects, social considerations, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This indicates a complete lack of integration of sustainability principles.