2026 Insurer Tender

This tender is clear and contains essential information, but it has significant deficiencies regarding evaluation criteria, e-submission, and an unusually short contract duration.

Legal compliance is generally good with a clearly defined open procedure and appropriate CPV code. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the missing 'Liable Person' are notable disclosure weaknesses.

The tender's title, description, and AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. The scope of general insurance services, contract duration, and start date are well-defined.

While basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are present, the tender is incomplete due to the missing 'Liable Person' and, critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria. Only one of four tender documents is summarized, limiting a full assessment.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the AI-extracted requirements appear generic. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot understand the basis for award. The absence of e-submission also hinders equal access.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. Nevertheless, the lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant practical drawback, increasing administrative burden. A direct document URL is also not provided in the summary.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and no disputes are reported. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and procedure codes are 'N/A'. Most notably, a 1-month contract duration for an insurance tender with an estimated value of over 1 million EUR is highly unusual and suggests a potential data inconsistency or an unclarified interim arrangement.

The tender does not incorporate any criteria related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.