Treatment of Absorbent Hygiene Products and Associated Waste

This tender for Absorbent Hygiene Products waste treatment is generally well-described but suffers from significant omissions regarding evaluation criteria, explicit financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds, impacting its overall quality and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and, critically, evaluation criteria, represents a notable gap in compliance with standard procurement regulations. The 'Required: No' status for the main document is also unusual.

The service description, waste type, and delivery options are clearly articulated. The AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are also clear. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, financial value, and timeline are well-provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed financial requirements, and, most notably, the lack of specified evaluation criteria. The status of the main document as 'Required: No' also suggests potential incompleteness in the accessible documentation.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides a reasonable submission period. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot understand the basis of award. The absence of e-submission and the 'Required: No' status for the main document also present barriers to equal access and full transparency.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. However, the lack of electronic submission capabilities is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. The absence of a direct document URL also suggests potential hurdles in accessing the full tender package.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with most key fields populated and logical dates. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions like the 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure type do not significantly detract from overall consistency.

While the tender concerns waste treatment, which has inherent environmental relevance, it does not explicitly incorporate specific green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.