Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and no disputes are reported. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and specific financial requirements in the provided summary, along with the confusing 'Required: No' for the official PDF, indicates potential gaps in full legal disclosure.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds explicitly stated in the provided tender information.
•No specific financial requirements explicitly stated in the provided tender information.
Clarity80/100
The description of the Flexible Procurement System and its four Lots is clear and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue, as bidders cannot ascertain how their proposals will be judged.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, estimated value, and duration are provided. Nevertheless, the explicit lack of mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria, represents significant omissions in the tender documentation summary.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Missing explicit financial requirements.
Fairness85/100
The tender discloses the estimated value, indicates e-procurement, and divides the service into multiple lots, promoting competition. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely impacts transparency and fairness, as bidders lack insight into the assessment process.
•No evaluation criteria specified, hindering transparency and objective assessment.
Practicality65/100
E-Procurement is indicated, and the duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date being in the past (July 2023) while the tender is active in 2026 creates significant practical confusion regarding the operational status of the FPS.
•Contract start date (2023-07-02) is in the past relative to today's date (2026-01-18), creating confusion.
•The statement 'The Council will place packages through the FPS as its sole contracting approach from July 2023' implies the system is already operational, conflicting with an 'active' tender to 'establish' it.
Data Consistency50/100
The most significant inconsistency is the contract start date (2023-07-02) being in the past, conflicting with the tender's 'active' status and the stated purpose to 'establish' the FPS. Minor inconsistencies include missing 'Liable Person' and 'N/A' codes for procedure type.
•Contract start date (2023-07-02) is in the past and inconsistent with the tender's active status and purpose.
•Missing 'Liable Person' information.
Sustainability50/100
The core service of providing supported accommodation for vulnerable young people inherently addresses social aspects. However, the tender does not explicitly include additional green procurement, innovation, or broader social criteria for suppliers.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit innovation focus.