Legal Compliance75/100
The tender benefits from a reasonable submission deadline and correct CPV codes. However, the absence of specified mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and a 'Liable Person', along with 'Code: N/A' for the procedure type, represents significant legal compliance gaps.
•Missing Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
•Missing Eligibility Requirements
Clarity80/100
The service description and AI-extracted technical requirements are very clear and detailed. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity flaw, making it difficult for bidders to understand how proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Missing detailed submission requirements
Completeness70/100
While basic information, value, and duration are present, the tender is incomplete due to the missing 'Liable Person', unspecified mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds, and crucially, the absence of evaluation criteria. Information on all tender documents is also not fully provided.
•Missing Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
•Missing Eligibility Requirements
Fairness85/100
The tender provides a reasonable submission deadline and discloses the estimated value. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of e-submission significantly undermine fairness and equal access for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
The lack of e-submission is a significant practical drawback. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is illogical and highly impractical, indicating a potential administrative oversight or unrealistic timeline.
•No e-submission
•Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Data Consistency90/100
Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency is the contract start date matching the submission deadline, which is a significant logical error.
•Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
•Missing Liable Person
Sustainability50/100
The tender includes an 'Innovation Focus' and the service itself is inherently social. However, it lacks explicit green procurement criteria and additional social clauses beyond the core service delivery, limiting its broader sustainability impact.
•Not green procurement
•No explicit additional social criteria