APPROVED PROVIDER LIST FOR THE PROVISION OF DETOXIFICATION AND RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR ADULTS WITH PROBLEMATIC SUBSTANCE MISUSE

This tender notice for a Dynamic Approved Provider List (DAPL) provides essential service information but critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, significantly impacting fairness and clarity. While the overall purpose is clear, key details for potential providers are missing or contradictory.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly assigned, and there are no disputes. However, the contradiction between the disclosed estimated value and the 'Value Classified: Yes' flag, along with the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the notice, are minor legal compliance concerns.

The description of services and the purpose of the DAPL are clear. However, the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue, as it leaves potential providers without understanding how admission to the list will be determined.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location are provided. Nevertheless, the critical omission of evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements constitutes significant gaps in the completeness of the tender notice.

While e-procurement is indicated and service requirements appear generic, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical fairness issue, undermining transparency and objectivity in the admission process. The value classification contradiction also slightly impacts transparency.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. E-procurement is listed as a characteristic, which is positive, but this is contradicted by an automated check indicating 'No e-submission', creating confusion. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided.

Several inconsistencies are present, notably the contradiction between the disclosed estimated value and its 'classified' status, and the conflicting information regarding e-procurement/e-submission. The 'Liable Person' field is also unpopulated.

The tender notice does not explicitly include any green procurement, social criteria (beyond the inherent social value of the service itself), or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.