Development of the general part of the description of the social services efficiency evaluation system

This tender is severely lacking in essential documentation and detailed requirements, making it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant offer. Key legal and procedural elements are absent, raising significant concerns about transparency and fairness.

Legal compliance is severely compromised due to the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and full tender documents. This directly impacts the legality and fairness of the procurement process.

While the project description and technical capabilities are somewhat clear, the overall clarity is undermined by the lack of full tender documents, detailed financial requirements, and complete evaluation criteria.

The tender is extremely incomplete. Critical sections such as mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and the entire set of tender documents are missing. This renders the tender practically unbiddable.

The absence of complete tender documents, detailed eligibility/exclusion criteria, and full evaluation criteria creates a highly unfair environment. Bidders cannot understand the full scope, risks, or how their offers will be judged, potentially favoring those with insider information. The mention of '21 points' for expert experience without context is also unfair.

The tender is impractical for bidders due to the complete lack of tender documents. It is impossible to prepare a serious offer without access to the full terms of reference, contract drafts, and detailed instructions.

The provided summary data is internally consistent, but the critical inconsistency lies in the absence of actual tender documents, which should contain all the detailed information. The CPV code 0 is also an inconsistency with standard practice.

No information is provided regarding green procurement or social criteria, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability aspects in this tender.