Cleaning and Minor Repairs Services

This tender for cleaning and minor repairs services presents a clear scope of work and requirements but suffers from significant gaps in transparency, particularly the absence of evaluation criteria and inconsistencies in key data.

The tender defines the procedure type and assigns a relevant CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned. However, the absence of a reveal date and, critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are notable omissions that impact legal transparency and compliance with best practices.

The service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the missing liable person, reveal date, and the critical absence of evaluation criteria. Only one of four listed documents has a summary, raising questions about full document availability.

The tender's value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company. The 'Divided into Parts' characteristic is positive for competition. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot objectively prepare their proposals. There is also a contradiction regarding e-procurement/e-submission.

The contract duration is specified, and financing information is available. However, the lack of a clear contract start date and the contradiction regarding e-submission (with automated checks indicating no e-submission) reduce practicality. A document URL is also not explicitly provided.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a significant inconsistency in the estimated value's currency (£100,000 in description vs. 100,000.00 EUR in financial information). A major contradiction exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check result.

The tender completely lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.