Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login28 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
5 documents available with AI summaries
This document is a notice summary for the LLDC's Engineering & Associated Services Framework, providing an overview of the tender and instructions on how to access the full documents and participate via the Delta eSourcing portal.
This OCDS record provides the official structured data for the London Legacy Development Corporation's Engineering & Associated Services Framework tender, detailing the buyer, contact information, and the tender's initiation.
This OCDS data package provides structured information about the London Legacy Development Corporation's Engineering & Associated Services Framework tender, including buyer details and the tender's legal basis.
This document is an official notice for a multi-lot framework for professional engineering, technical advisory, and specialist survey services for Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, valued at £50M, with a maximum of one lot awarded per supplier.
The London Legacy Development Corporation is seeking to establish a multi-lot Engineering & Associated Services Framework to procure professional engineering, technical advisory, and specialist survey services for the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park and associated assets.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender provides a clear description of required services and utilizes a multi-lot framework, but it suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and an illogical contract start date, impacting fairness and practicality.
The tender appears to follow appropriate UK procurement procedures, with a relevant CPV code and a reasonable lead time for submission. However, the summary lacks specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds, directing bidders to external documents.
The project description and service requirements are clear and well-articulated. A significant drawback is the explicit absence of evaluation criteria in the provided information, which is crucial for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
Basic information like title, organization, value, and duration is present. However, the provided summary is incomplete regarding critical details such as evaluation criteria, full financial requirements, and mandatory exclusion grounds. The main tender documents are linked externally rather than being directly provided.
The tender promotes fairness through value disclosure, e-procurement, and a multi-lot structure with a 'one lot per supplier' limit. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly undermines transparency and fairness, as bidders cannot adequately prepare or understand the basis of award.
Electronic submission via a dedicated portal and clear document URLs enhance practicality. The major practical flaw is the stated contract start date being identical to the submission deadline, which is unrealistic and indicates an error in the tender's timeline.
While most key fields are populated, there are significant inconsistencies. The contract start date is identical to the submission deadline, which is illogical. There are also minor discrepancies in the submission deadline time and the estimated value between different parts of the provided information.
The tender description mentions a commitment to 'sustainable engineering outcomes,' which is a positive indication. However, the provided summary does not detail specific green, social, or innovation criteria, suggesting that sustainability aspects are not yet fully integrated or explicitly weighted in the evaluation.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required