Scan4Safety - Supply of IMS & POC Scanning System and Associated Hardware Devices

This tender for Scan4Safety systems demonstrates good clarity in its description and technical requirements, but significant concerns exist regarding the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and the lack of electronic submission.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date prevents assessment of the minimum legal period for submission, and the lack of explicitly stated mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria raises concerns about full compliance with transparency requirements.

The project description and technical capability requirements are clear and well-defined, outlining the scope and expected outcomes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are provided. However, critical elements such as explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial thresholds, and detailed evaluation criteria are missing, impacting the overall completeness of the tender information.

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value, allowing bids for individual categories, and inviting supplier input on requirements. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand the basis of award, severely impacting transparency and equal treatment. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier.

Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly stated. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a significant practical drawback for modern procurement processes, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes. Most key fields are populated, ensuring reliability of the core information.

The tender incorporates "Innovation Focus" and "Social Criteria" (e.g., patient safety) as characteristics, indicating a partial commitment to sustainability. However, it is explicitly noted as "Not green procurement" and "Not EU funded," suggesting a limited scope for environmental considerations.