Legal Compliance75/100
The tender states compliance with Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and uses an appropriate CPV code. However, the classified value and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria present minor compliance risks regarding transparency requirements.
•Estimated value is classified and not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity50/100
While the overall description of the procurement's purpose and scope is clear, the critical absence of detailed requirements beyond mandatory exclusion grounds and, more importantly, the lack of any specified evaluation criteria, make the tender highly unclear for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•AI-extracted requirements are minimal and lack detail
Completeness70/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and duration is present. However, the classified value, minimal requirements, and the explicit lack of evaluation criteria represent significant gaps in the tender's completeness.
•Estimated value is not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness40/100
Fairness is severely compromised by the classified estimated value, the complete absence of transparent evaluation criteria, and the lack of electronic submission. These factors create an uneven playing field and reduce transparency for all potential bidders.
•Estimated value is classified and not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality60/100
The contract duration is clearly specified, which is practical. However, the absence of electronic submission, the lack of a direct document URL (implied from the data), and the classified value reduce the practicality and ease of participation for potential suppliers.
•No e-submission supported
•Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency80/100
The data is generally consistent, with key fields populated and no disputes or suspensions. However, the missing 'Liable Person' and the critical absence of evaluation criteria detract from perfect consistency.
•Liable person is missing
•No evaluation criteria specified
Sustainability20/100
The tender shows no indication of incorporating green procurement principles, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a significant missed opportunity for a large housing trust to leverage its procurement for broader societal benefits.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria