Routine maintenance works of state roads in 2027-2032 (in Bauska, Ogre, Riga, Preiļi and Dagda territories) (4 contracts)

The tender for state road maintenance works demonstrates good structural elements but is significantly hampered by critical issues such as undisclosed estimated value and restricted document access, which severely impact fairness and transparency.

The tender features an open procedure, reasonable submission deadlines (40 days), and adherence to WTO/GPA standards. However, the imprecise CPV code for 'daily maintenance works' and, critically, the 'Restricted document access' and 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' are significant legal compliance concerns regarding transparency and fair competition.

The tender title and description are clear, and AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive. Document summaries indicate detailed requirements for each part, including evaluation criteria, which contradicts an automated flag. The existence of multiple versions for part requirements could introduce minor confusion if not clearly managed.

Basic information, deadlines, duration (2027-2032), and location are well-defined. Detailed requirements for each of the four parts are indicated in the documents. However, the 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' is a major omission, and 'Restricted document access' is a critical completeness issue.

While e-procurement is enabled and submission deadlines are reasonable, the 'Restricted document access' and 'Estimated Value: Not disclosed' are critical flaws. These issues severely undermine transparency and equal access for all potential bidders, making it difficult to assess the opportunity fairly.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start date (2027) and duration (6 years) are clearly specified. However, the 'Restricted document access' could pose practical challenges for bidders in preparing their proposals. Specific financing information beyond the contracting authority is not provided.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent. Several automated check results contradicted the explicit tender data (e.g., e-submission, contract duration, evaluation criteria), but the tender's own data is largely consistent, with the main exception being the undisclosed estimated value.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. There is no indication of EU funding, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.