Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines an Open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. There are no reported disputes. However, the provided text lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements for bidders, which are fundamental for a legally compliant tender notice. The missing reveal date also impacts transparency.
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds stated in the provided text
•No explicit financial requirements for the bidder stated in the provided text
Clarity80/100
The service description and technical capability requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue, preventing bidders from fully understanding how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location are provided. A link to full procurement documentation is available. Nevertheless, the notice is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements for bidders in the provided text.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds stated in the provided text
Fairness85/100
Full document access is provided via a link, the estimated value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored to a specific company. Electronic submission is implied. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly undermines the objectivity and transparency essential for fair competition.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission is supported, a document URL is provided, and the contract start date, financing information, and duration are specified. The conditional funding for years 2 and 3 introduces some uncertainty for long-term planning.
•Conditional funding for years 2 and 3 introduces uncertainty
Data Consistency90/100
Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent. A minor discrepancy exists between the EUR and GBP estimated values, but this is often due to exchange rate fluctuations or rounding.
•Slight discrepancy between EUR and GBP estimated values
Sustainability50/100
While the service itself (cervical screening) inherently contributes to social well-being, the tender documentation does not explicitly include green, broader social, or innovation-focused procurement criteria for bidders. It is not EU funded.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria (beyond the service's inherent benefit)