United Kingdom1883 days leftOpen

Dynamic purchasing system for supply of antidotes and antibotics

Tender Overview

LOCATION

United Kingdom, United Kingdom

VALUE

£35,000,000

DEADLINE

March 31, 2031 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

33600000

REFERENCE

003153-2021

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The establishment of a dynamic purchasing system (DPS) to allow for the purchase and stockpile of antidotes and antibiotics for the use in the event of an emergency.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a supplier of pharmaceutical products, specifically antidotes and antibiotics.
  • Be capable of supplying and stockpiling antidotes and antibiotics.
  • Be able to participate through the designated e-procurement portal.
  • Be a company suitable for participation in a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS).
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Demonstrate capability to supply pharmaceutical products (antidotes and antibiotics).
  • Demonstrate capability to stockpile antidotes and antibiotics.
  • Demonstrate capability to respond effectively in emergency situations.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit all required information and documents via the e-procurement portal.
  • Ensure submission is completed by the deadline: 2031-03-31 12:00:00.
  • Understand that participation is for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for future call-offs.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF003153-2021_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is a contract notice announcing the establishment of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) by Public Health England for the supply and stockpile of antidotes and antibiotics, with an estimated value of £35 million, and directs interested suppliers to the e-procurement portal for participation.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

65
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for critical medical supplies, demonstrating good foundational information but suffering from significant gaps in evaluation criteria and sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally complies with the framework for establishing a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), with a clear CPV code and no disputes. However, there is a slight ambiguity in defining the procedure as 'Restricted procedure' alongside 'DPS', and the reveal date is missing.

Ambiguity in procedure type (Restricted vs. DPS)
Missing reveal date
Clarity65/100

The description and AI-extracted requirements for admission to the DPS are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for both admission and subsequent call-offs significantly reduces clarity for potential suppliers.

Missing evaluation criteria for admission to DPS and subsequent call-offs
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and CPV codes are well-defined. However, the tender lacks detailed evaluation criteria, which is a significant omission. Additionally, only one document summary is provided out of four total, limiting a full assessment of the complete tender package.

Missing detailed evaluation criteria
Only one document summary provided out of four total
Fairness55/100

The tender benefits from a disclosed value, e-procurement enablement, and generic requirements that do not appear tailored. The extremely long submission deadline provides ample time for preparation. However, the critical absence of transparent evaluation criteria severely undermines fairness, as suppliers cannot objectively understand how their submissions will be judged.

Missing evaluation criteria for admission to DPS and subsequent call-offs
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. The estimated value is known. However, an explicit document URL is not provided in the summary, and the exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, though the duration is clear from the DPS establishment.

Explicit document URL not provided
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates, including the long submission deadline and contract duration, are logical for a Dynamic Purchasing System. Minor inconsistencies include the unspecified 'Liable Person' and 'Type/Procedure Code N/A', along with the missing reveal date.

"Liable Person" not specified
"Type/Procedure Code" N/A
Sustainability20/100

The tender completely lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. In modern public procurement, the integration of sustainability criteria is a standard expectation, making this a significant omission.

Absence of green procurement criteria
Absence of social criteria

Strengths

Clear purpose and description of the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)
Estimated value and duration are clearly specified
E-procurement is enabled, promoting accessibility
Requirements for admission to the DPS are clearly categorized
Long submission deadline provides ample time for preparation

Concerns

Critical absence of detailed evaluation criteria for admission and subsequent call-offs
Lack of any sustainability (green, social, innovation) considerations
Ambiguity regarding the specific 'Restricted procedure' in conjunction with DPS
Only one document summary provided out of four total, limiting full assessment
Missing explicit document URL and contract start date

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive and transparent evaluation criteria for both DPS admission and subsequent call-offs.
2. Integrate sustainability criteria (environmental, social, innovation) into the tender requirements.
3. Clarify the procedural framework, especially the relationship between 'Restricted procedure' and the DPS.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
65/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes