Legal Compliance75/100
The tender states adherence to Public Procurement Regulations and uses a clear open procedure with an appropriate CPV code. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a discrepancy in the estimated value are minor compliance concerns regarding full transparency.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria
•Discrepancy in estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
Clarity60/100
While the description and basic requirements are clear, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
Most essential information like title, organization, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the missing evaluation criteria and the notable inconsistency in the estimated contract value.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Discrepancy in estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
Fairness55/100
The use of an e-procurement system and a reasonable submission period promote equal access. Nevertheless, the critical omission of evaluation criteria severely undermines fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot objectively prepare or compare bids.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality70/100
The tender supports electronic submission via a specified platform (Jaggaer) and provides clear dates for contract start and duration, enhancing practical accessibility for bidders.
Data Consistency75/100
Key fields are mostly populated, and dates are logical. The primary inconsistency lies in the estimated value, which is stated in both EUR (93M) and GBP (30-74M) without clear reconciliation. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.
•Discrepancy in estimated value (EUR vs GBP)
•'Liable Person' field empty
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.
•No green procurement criteria mentioned
•No social criteria mentioned