Legal Compliance65/100
The basic structure of the tender appears compliant, defining the procedure type and assigning a relevant CPV code. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed financial standing requirements, and a 'Liable Person' are notable gaps. The missing reveal date prevents a full assessment of the 7-day minimum for legal compliance, though the 29-day submission period from today's date is generally reasonable.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing explicit financial standing requirements
Clarity50/100
The project description and AI-extracted requirements for eligibility and technical capabilities are detailed, comprehensive, and clear. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, making it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged, severely impacting overall clarity.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100
While essential information like title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location are provided, critical elements are missing. These include evaluation criteria, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed financial requirements, and the 'Liable Person'. The limited summary of tender documents also suggests potential incompleteness of the provided information.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No explicit financial standing requirements
Fairness40/100
The tender's fairness is significantly undermined by the complete lack of evaluation criteria, which prevents objective and transparent assessment of bids. Furthermore, the absence of electronic submission (e-submission) creates a barrier to equal access and efficient participation for potential suppliers. The requirements, while specialized, encourage consortia, which helps mitigate concerns about tailoring to a single company.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No electronic submission supported
Practicality40/100
The lack of electronic submission is a major practical drawback, increasing administrative burden for bidders. The absence of a direct document URL also makes accessing full tender documents less straightforward. While the contract start date and duration are clear, these practical hurdles reduce the overall score.
•No electronic submission supported
•No direct document URL provided
Data Consistency85/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the 'Liable Person' not being specified and the main description being repeated in the 'Additional Info' section.
•'Liable Person' not specified
•Description repeated in 'Additional Info'
Sustainability90/100
The tender's core subject matter—Built Environment Adaptation & Resilience to climate hazards, decarbonisation, nature-based solutions, and public health implications—is inherently focused on environmental sustainability and social aspects. The explicit mention of 'Innovation Focus' further strengthens this category, indicating a strong commitment to sustainable and forward-thinking solutions.