Cleaning Subcontractor Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for cleaning subcontractors, notably focusing on SMEs, and benefits from e-procurement. However, it significantly lacks transparency due to an undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, alongside overly general requirements.

The tender defines the procedure as a DPS and correctly assigns the CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned. However, the 'Restricted (Code: N/A)' is vague, a liable person is missing, and the absence of detailed evaluation criteria is a significant concern for compliance with transparency principles.

The overall purpose and description are clear, including the focus on SMEs. However, the AI-extracted requirements are very general, lacking specific metrics or thresholds for technical and financial capabilities. Crucially, the tender explicitly states 'No evaluation criteria specified', which is a major deficiency in clarity.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are provided. CPV and NUTS codes are present. However, the estimated value is classified, the liable person is missing, and the critical absence of evaluation criteria makes the tender incomplete. The 'Required: No' for the Official PDF Version is also concerning.

The DPS structure, focus on SMEs, 'Divided into Parts' characteristic, and e-procurement support fairness. The long submission period for the DPS also allows ample time. However, the classified value reduces transparency, and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major impediment to objective and transparent assessment, significantly impacting fairness.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not known, and financing information (estimated value) is unavailable. While documents are available, an explicit URL is not provided in the basic information.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include the missing liable person and the 'N/A' codes for procedure type, but these do not impact core data integrity.

The tender explicitly focuses on partnering with Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and is 'Divided into Parts', which are strong social sustainability aspects. However, there is no mention of green procurement initiatives or innovation focus.