The Supply of Services Relating to the Treatment and Energy Recovery/Disposal of Residual Waste Arisings

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) demonstrates good clarity in service description and promotes fair competition, but lacks detailed financial requirements and explicit evaluation criteria in the provided summary.

The tender correctly identifies the procedure as a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) and uses an appropriate CPV code. Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned, indicating adherence to legal frameworks. The submission deadline is exceptionally long, which is suitable for a DPS. Minor issues include 'N/A' codes for procedure type and the absence of specific financial requirements in the provided summary.

The description of the DPS and its four lots is very clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are well-defined. However, the explicit absence of detailed financial requirements and, critically, evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, estimated value, duration, and CPV codes are all present. The tender is divided into lots, which is good. However, the lack of detailed financial requirements and, most notably, the absence of specified evaluation criteria for DPS admission and subsequent call-off competitions represent significant gaps in completeness. The summary of the single provided document is also very brief.

The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) with no limit on service providers and continuous entry promotes high fairness and equal access. The tender is divided into parts (lots), further encouraging participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored. The main concern for fairness is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which can hinder transparency.

E-Procurement is enabled, which enhances practicality. The contract duration for call-offs is specified, and the value is clear. However, the absence of a direct document URL in the provided information and the lack of specific financial requirements could pose practical challenges for bidders in fully assessing the opportunity. The 'Not EU funded' status might imply less stringent practical reporting requirements.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical, especially the long submission deadline for a DPS. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include 'N/A' codes for procedure type and a potential discrepancy with 'Over Sum Limit: No' given the high estimated value, though this could refer to a specific national threshold.

While the core service involves energy recovery from waste, which has inherent environmental benefits, the tender documentation does not explicitly integrate broader green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to leverage the procurement for wider sustainability goals.