Saeimas ēku telpu uzkopšana

This tender for Saeima building cleaning services is well-structured with detailed technical requirements and includes green procurement aspects. However, critical issues such as undisclosed estimated value, missing evaluation criteria, and flagged restricted document access significantly compromise its transparency, fairness, and legal compliance.

The tender defines a clear open procedure, assigns an appropriate CPV code, and provides a reasonable submission period. However, the undisclosed estimated value, flagged restricted document access, and absence of specified evaluation criteria are significant concerns regarding transparency and equal treatment, which are fundamental to legal compliance.

The service description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements are detailed and refer to specific tender documents. Performance conditions are also clearly referenced. Nevertheless, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed, which is a major clarity deficiency.

Basic information, deadlines, duration, and detailed location data are provided. All relevant documents are listed and summarized, and requirements are extensively defined. However, the estimated contract value is not disclosed, and the evaluation criteria are missing, representing significant gaps in completeness. Minor issues include 'N/A' codes for Type and Procedure.

The tender's fairness is severely compromised by the flagged restricted document access, the undisclosed estimated value, and the absence of specified evaluation criteria. These issues create an opaque process, hindering equal opportunity and transparent assessment, despite the use of an e-procurement system.

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the undisclosed estimated value makes it difficult for bidders to prepare practical and competitive financial offers. The flagged restricted document access could also pose a significant practical barrier for potential bidders.

Key dates are logical and consistent, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Most essential fields are populated. However, the 'N/A' codes for tender type and procedure, along with the undisclosed estimated value, indicate minor data gaps. Contradictions between automated checks and explicit tender characteristics (e.g., e-procurement, green procurement) suggest some underlying data quality issues, though these were resolved by prioritizing explicit tender content.

The tender explicitly includes green procurement requirements, which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of social aspects or an innovation focus, limiting its overall sustainability scope.