Safer Neighbourhoods Team

This tender provides a clear description of the required services and practical access for bidders, but it suffers from significant omissions regarding evaluation criteria, which severely impacts fairness and completeness.

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined and appropriate. However, the missing tender reveal date and the contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' flag (despite the value being provided) represent transparency and disclosure issues.

The service description is exceptionally clear and unambiguous, and the AI-extracted requirements are well-documented and understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are all provided. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria is a major completeness gap. Additionally, only one of four tender documents has a summary, suggesting potential for further missing context.

Full document access via the e-sourcing portal, electronic submission, and generic requirements contribute positively to fairness. However, the complete lack of objective and transparent evaluation criteria is a significant barrier to fair competition, as bidders cannot understand the basis of award.

Electronic submission is supported, direct URLs to the portal are provided, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. This makes the tender highly practical for potential bidders.

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there are notable inconsistencies. These include the missing tender reveal date, the currency discrepancy (EUR in basic info vs. GBP in document summary), and the contradiction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified: Yes'.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.