Bērnu rotaļu laukumu un aktīvās atpūtas laukumu uzturēšana un remonts

The tender documentation is generally clear and contains most basic information, but significant deficiencies include restricted document access and the absence of evaluation criteria, which severely impact transparency and fairness.

The tender generally follows standard procedures (open, CPV, reasonable deadline) and indicates WTO/GPA compliance. However, 'Restricted document access' and the absence of specified evaluation criteria are significant compliance risks that could lead to legal challenges.

While the description and many requirements (exclusion, selection, technical, financial) are detailed and well-referenced, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity regarding how bids will be judged and awarded.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, and contract duration, is present. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the complete absence of explicit evaluation criteria represent significant gaps in completeness.

The open procedure, disclosed value, and reasonable deadlines are positive aspects. However, 'Restricted document access' and the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria are fundamental fairness breaches, preventing equal access to information and transparent competition.

The tender supports electronic submission via the 'Elektronisko iepirkumu sistēma' and clearly specifies the contract duration (with extension option), enhancing practicality for bidders. The contract start date is linked to signing, which is standard.

Key fields are largely populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies like N/A codes for type/procedure are not critical given the descriptive text.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.