PT1331 2022 Passenger Transport - Dynamic Purchasing System

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for passenger transport services, demonstrating good clarity on service scope and duration, but significantly lacks transparency regarding estimated value and, critically, the evaluation criteria for DPS admission.

The tender clearly defines the procedure as a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) and assigns an appropriate CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable for a DPS, allowing continuous application. No disputes or suspensions are noted. The classified value is a transparency issue but not necessarily a legal non-compliance for a DPS where overall value is often indicative. The summary lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements, but these are expected in the full documentation.

The description of the DPS, its lots, scope, and duration is clear and unambiguous. Technical and eligibility requirements are well-defined. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS is a significant clarity issue, making it difficult for potential suppliers to understand how their applications will be judged.

Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided. Requirements for eligibility and technical capability are present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucially, the evaluation criteria for DPS admission are missing from the provided information. While one document is mentioned, a direct URL is not provided.

The tender benefits from being a DPS, allowing continuous application, and explicitly supports e-procurement, promoting equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the classified value reduces transparency, and the absence of specified evaluation criteria for DPS admission significantly impacts the objectivity and transparency of the selection process, raising fairness concerns.

The tender supports electronic submission ("E-Procurement" characteristic). Key dates like DPS opening and call-off commencement are known, and the duration is clear. However, a direct document URL is not provided in the summary, and specific financing information beyond the council as the organization is absent.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent for a DPS. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The only minor inconsistency is the automated check result "No e-submission" contradicting the "E-Procurement" characteristic, which is assumed to be an error in the automated check.

The tender explicitly includes "Social Criteria" as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement initiatives or a focus on innovation. It is also not EU funded.